![]() ![]() The ranking of European capital cities was based on this rank score. Using hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), we synthesized 32 indicators into 4 components and computed rank scores. This paper ranks 28 European capital cities based on how smart and sustainable they are. There has recently been a conscious push for cities in Europe to be smarter and more sustainable, leading to the need to benchmark these cities' efforts using robust assessment frameworks. The ECQI could be used to assist public policies designed to improve perception in regions where it is needed. The comparisons with the Sustainable Cities Index (Arcadis), the Global Power City Index (Institute for Urban Strategies), Cities in Motion (IESE), the Cities Prosperity Index (UN), and Dynamic Cities (Savills) help us understand the potential use of this new index and its purpose as a tool for assessing public policy. At the other end of the spectrum, Sofia, Plovdiv, and Bucharest, with severe deficiencies in every dimension, scored worst on the study. We find that London, Aarhus, and Berlin are the cities with the highest scores in the index, with northern European cities performing the best. ![]() Using collected data from 66 cities belonging to the 28 countries within the European Union and applying the principal components analysis method, we construct the European Cities Quality Index (ECQI) as a combination of eight dimensions: (1) Public health, (2) Education, (3) Employment and incomes, (4) Environment, (5) Gender equality, (6) Leisure and entertainment, (7) Housing and safety and (8) Transport and mobility, that are in turn made up of 40 distinct variables. ![]() ![]() In this paper, we propose an index to measure the quality of the most important European cities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |